← All teardowns
Illustrative study with synthetic respondents — not the company's data. Pricing teardown · Calendly · August 2026

Calendly moved its AI notetaker out of the base plans and into new $18 and $24 tiers. Would buyers pay $8 more per seat?

On August 19, 2026, Calendly launched Standard Plus and Teams Plus, $8 a seat above Standard and Teams, with its AI notetaker and a new AI assistant, Callie. The day before, its Notetaker page said the notetaker was included in all paid plans. This teardown looks at the decision behind it, and how you'd test it.

Public sources only, each citedPrices in USD per seat per month, billed yearlyChecked October 3, 2026
In short
  • Until August 18, 2026, Calendly's Notetaker page said it was included in all paid Calendly plans.2
  • On August 19, the notetaker and a new AI assistant moved to Standard Plus ($18) and Teams Plus ($24), $8 a seat above Standard ($10) and Teams ($16), which no longer include it.1,4
  • The test: how many buyers pay the $8, and does the gain outweigh the buyers who stay on the base plan without the notetaker?
Situation

A scheduling tool with a notetaker thrown in

Calendly sells scheduling per seat: Standard at $10 and Teams at $16 a month, billed yearly, as of July 2026.3 Its AI notetaker, which joins Zoom, Google Meet and Microsoft Teams calls and writes recaps and action items, was described as included in all paid plans.2

Task

Keep AI in the base price, or charge for it separately?

Calendly hasn't published its reasoning. The pricing decision it faced is a common one: a feature that costs money to run can stay in the base price, which keeps the lineup simple, or move to a higher tier, which charges the people who use it but takes it away from those who don't upgrade.

If it moves, how large can the step up be before buyers stay where they are?

Before deciding: what you'd want to know

Four questions a pricing study can answer

  1. Which AI features in a scheduling tool do buyers care about most?MaxDiff →
  2. Should the AI notetaker stay in the base plans, or move to higher tiers?Conjoint →
  3. What is the acceptable price range for a scheduling plan with AI?Van Westendorp →
  4. How much extra per seat will buyers pay for the AI upgrade?Gabor-Granger →

The order runs from the offer to the price: what buyers value, how to package it, the range they accept, then the exact price. Each question is asked separately of the two groups the change affects differently: buyers who already use an AI notetaker such as Otter, Fireflies or Granola, and buyers who don't. The study, run in Albi, is at the end.

Action

Two new tiers, $8 a seat above the base

On August 19, 2026, Calendly announced Calendly Notetaker and Callie, an AI assistant that schedules over email, available on new Standard Plus and Teams Plus plans.1 On the pricing page archived three days later, Standard and Teams list the notetaker as Not included.4

Per seat per monthBefore (July 2026)After (August 2026)
Standard$10 · notetaker included$10 · notetaker not included
Teams$16 · notetaker included$16 · notetaker not included
Standard Plus—$18 · Notetaker + Callie
Teams Plus—$24 · Notetaker + Callie

Billed yearly. Billed monthly, the Plus plans are $24 and $32.4 Sources: archived pricing and Notetaker pages2,3,4; Calendly Help.5

Each Plus plan is $8 a seat above its base plan

$0$5$10$15$20$25$30Standard$10Standard Plus$18Teams$16Teams Plus$24
Price per seat per month, billed yearly. Purple: the $8 step up.4
Result

What is public so far

The current pricing page still lists Standard at $10 and Teams at $16, without the notetaker.6 Calendly hasn't published how many customers moved to the Plus plans, or what happened to existing customers who used the notetaker on Standard or Teams. This teardown makes no claim about either.

The study

From the four questions to the decision

Illustrative study with synthetic respondents — not the company's data.

We ran the four questions above as one Albi survey. The respondents are people who choose or pay for a scheduling tool for themselves or their team at US companies of 1 to 250 people: 150 who already use an AI notetaker for meetings, and 150 who don't.

These results come from synthetic respondents: AI-modelled buyer profiles, not people. Use them to shape the question, then confirm with real respondents. Run in Albi on October 3, 2026, with 300 synthetic respondents generated by Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite. Every chart below meets the minimum sample Albi sets for its method.

1

Which AI features in a scheduling tool do buyers care about most?

MaxDiff · all 300
10 = average Meeting recaps and action items21.0 Meeting prep briefs12.6 Draft follow-up emails11.7 Recording on Zoom, Meet and Teams10.7 Assistant that schedules from email10.7 Sync of notes to your CRM10.6 Unlimited recaps8.6 Full meeting transcripts6.3 Admin controls for AI4.5 Passcode-protected sharing3.3
Preference score; the 10 features sum to 100. Purple: the email scheduling assistant, new with the Plus plans. Grey: the rest. Names shortened; the survey described each feature in full. Synthetic respondents, n = 300.

Result. Meeting recaps and action items came first by a wide margin (21.0, twice the average). Prep briefs, follow-up emails, recording, the email assistant and CRM sync were bunched together between 10.6 and 12.6. Full transcripts, admin controls and passcode-protected sharing came last. Both groups ranked recaps first; buyers who already use a notetaker put the email assistant a little higher.

For the decision: recaps are what buyers value; the new assistant is mid-table. Most of what the Plus plans sell is the notetaker that used to be in the base plan.

2

Should the AI notetaker stay in the base plans, or move to higher tiers?

Conjoint · all 300 · 5 prices × 4 AI levels × 2 plan types

Notetaker in the base plans vs in Plus: what each lineup earns

Archived August 18, 2026

Notetaker included in paid plans

Standard$10
per seat · AI notetaker included
Teams$16
per seat · AI notetaker included
Share of seats
Share of revenue
SeatsRevenue
No plan bought (vs. these options)1%—
Standard58%47%
Teams41%53%
Monthly plan fees per 100 seats, billed yearly$1,235
From August 19, 2026

AI moves to Plus tiers

Standard$10
per seat · no AI notetaker
Teams$16
per seat · no AI notetaker
Standard Plus$18
per seat · Notetaker + Callie
Teams Plus$24
per seat · Notetaker + Callie
Share of seats
Share of revenue
SeatsRevenue
No plan bought (vs. these options)3%—
Standard19%12%
Teams12%12%
Standard Plus51%55%
Teams Plus15%21%
Monthly plan fees per 100 seats, billed yearly$1,650 +34%
Simulated from the conjoint: each respondent picks one of the plans or nothing ("No plan bought" means none of these plans, not a measured move to another tool). Prices per seat per month, billed yearly. Calendly's archived Notetaker page said it was included in all paid plans but stated no recap limit; the old side models it as unlimited recaps, without the email assistant, which launched on August 19. Modelled separately for buyers who already use an AI notetaker and buyers who don't, half of each. The result depends on the mix: +22% with 10% notetaker users, +45% with 90%. Two alternatives Albi tested, not Calendly plans: keeping 5 free recaps on the base plans gives $1,549 (+25%), and Plus tiers with the notetaker but no email assistant give $1,490 (+21%). Early read: synthetic respondents, n = 300.

Result. Price drove 55% of the choices and the AI package 35%; the plan type only 10%. With the notetaker in the base plans, almost everyone picks Standard or Teams. With the new lineup, 65% pick a Plus plan, and plan fees per 100 seats go from $1,235 to $1,650 a month, +34%. The split is sharp: 92% of buyers who already use a notetaker pick Plus, against 39% of those who don't. The share buying nothing rises from 1% to 3%.

For the decision: moving the notetaker up a tier raises plan revenue in this model, and by more the more of your buyers already use a notetaker. Most buyers without one stay on the base plan and lose the feature.

3

What is the acceptable price range for a scheduling plan with AI?

Van Westendorp · all 300, then each group
0%25%50%75%100% $5$10$15$20$25$30$35 Standard Plus $18 Acceptable range $15–$22 · optimal ≈ $18 Too cheap A bargain Getting expensive Too expensive $5$10$15$20$25$30$35Use an AI notetaker$16$22No AI notetaker$15$20○ optimal price
Top: share of all 300 who call each price too cheap or a bargain (falling), and getting expensive or too expensive (rising). The acceptable range runs from where "too cheap" crosses "getting expensive" to where "a bargain" crosses "too expensive"; the optimal price is where "too cheap" crosses "too expensive". Below: the same range for each group, n = 150 each. A scheduling plan with an AI notetaker (unlimited recaps) and an email scheduling assistant, per seat per month, billed yearly. The line marks Standard Plus at $18. Synthetic respondents.

Result. Across all 300, the acceptable range was $15 to $22 per seat, with the optimal price at about $18, Standard Plus's price. Buyers who already use a notetaker accept $16 to $22, optimal about $20; the others $15 to $20, optimal about $18.

For the decision: $18 sits in the middle of the range for both groups. Teams Plus at $24 is above it, but this question described a plan like Standard, without team features.

4

How much extra per seat will buyers pay for the AI upgrade?

Gabor-Granger · each group · $4, $6, $8, $10, $12 extra per seat
Share who would buy 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Upgrade revenue per 100 seats, per month $0 $250 $500 $750 $1,000 $4$6$8$10$12 Use an AI notetaker No AI notetaker All 300 ◯ peak
Top: share who would upgrade to a plan with the AI notetaker and email assistant at each extra price per seat per month, billed yearly (demand curve). Bottom: price × that share, per 100 seats; the circle marks each group's peak. The line marks Calendly's $8. Synthetic respondents, n = 150 per group.

Result. At $8 extra, 96% would upgrade. Demand falls after that: 85% at $10 and 72% at $12. Upgrade revenue per 100 seats keeps rising to the top of the tested range: $864 at $12 overall, $912 for buyers who already use a notetaker. For the others it peaks at $10 ($847).

For the decision: $8 is below the revenue-maximising extra in this test; $10 to $12 would earn more per seat while losing some upgrades. This question asks about upgrading in isolation; in the lineup (question 2), far fewer buyers without a notetaker choose Plus.

What the four add up to

Charging $8 for the notetaker raises plan revenue, but it splits the customer base by who already uses AI notes.

  • Value: meeting recaps are the feature buyers want most; the new assistant is mid-table (question 1).
  • Packaging: moving the notetaker to Plus raises plan fees by about a third, from +22% to +45% depending on how many buyers already use a notetaker (question 2).
  • Price: $18 is the optimal price for a plan with AI (question 3); asked in isolation, buyers would pay up to $12 extra (question 4).

What this study can't tell you: what existing customers who lose the notetaker do, since "No plan bought" is not a measured move to another tool; how many already pay for another notetaker and would not pay twice; and the cost of running the notetaker, which revenue here leaves out. Synthetic respondents may also overstate willingness to pay for a new AI feature; testing with real buyers is the next step. Calendly hasn't published what happened (see Result).

The full report · the PDF Albi produced for this survey: every question's chart, synthetic results labelled on every page PDF · 8 pages · download

How each method works, and how many respondents you need: Van Westendorp · Gabor-Granger · MaxDiff · Conjoint · Sample size

Find out what your buyers will pay, before you change the price

Run this survey yourselfStart from this Calendly survey and change it for your plans. $199 a survey, or $499 with conjoint, plus respondents: real people via Prolific, or synthetic.Use this survey →
Have Albi run itWe design, field and analyse a study on your own pricing question. Fixed price, invoiced.Talk to us about a study →

Calendly is a trademark of Calendly, LLC. Albi has no affiliation with Calendly, and this teardown is not endorsed by it.

Sources

  1. Calendly blog, "Introducing the new Calendly", August 19, 2026: Calendly Notetaker and Callie, an AI assistant, available on our new Standard Plus and Teams Plus plans. calendly.com
  2. Calendly's Notetaker page, Wayback Machine copy of August 18, 2026: Notetaker is included in all paid Calendly plans. web.archive.org
  3. Calendly pricing page, Wayback Machine copy of July 29, 2026: Standard $10 and Teams $16 per seat per month, billed yearly; no Plus plans. web.archive.org
  4. Calendly pricing page, Wayback Machine copy of August 22, 2026: Standard $10 and Teams $16, Notetaker Not included; Standard Plus $18 and Teams Plus $24 per seat per month billed yearly ($24 and $32 billed monthly), with Notetaker and Callie. web.archive.org
  5. Calendly Help, "AI at Calendly": Notetaker and the Callie AI assistant are available on Standard Plus and Teams Plus. calendly.com/help
  6. Calendly pricing page, checked October 3, 2026: Standard $10 and Teams $16 per seat per month billed yearly; Notetaker not included on Standard. calendly.com

We'd rather do this on your pricing than Calendly's.

Same method, your own data behind it, and a proposal you approve or don't.

Book a DemoGet Started